RECs reviewing non-health-related research in Hungary
In Hungary, the legal regulation of human research is primarily designed for the health field. Non-health-related research falls outside this specific legal framework. However, non-health-related research activities must still comply with general regulations, including the GDPR and Acts regarding data protection and scientific research (Act CXII of 2011, Act CXIX of 1995), scientific research, development and innovation (Act LXXVI of 2014), and national higher education (Act CCIV of 2011), as well as the Civil Code (Act V of 2013) and the Criminal Code (Act C of 2012).
While a legally mandated system of research ethics committees (RECs) exists for health-related research, oversight for other fields is decentralized. RECs reviewing non-health related research are typically established by scientific societies (like Hungarian Academy of Sciences) or on an institutional basis (e.g. universities and other research institutions).
Psychology research institutions were the pioneers in establishing ethical oversight, primarily to meet international publication standards. The Joint Committee on Ethics in Psychological Research was established as a joint body of several Hungarian institutions (University of Debrecen, Central European University, the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and the Universities of Pécs and Szeged) that conducts ethical reviews and issues approvals for psychological research undertaken at the participating institutions. Additional Hungarian research institutes may join with the unanimous consent of the participating institutions, provided that the institutions ensure that the authority for ethical review is transferred to the Committee. Each institution decides which projects require prior Committee approval, however the Committee’s decisions on submitted research plans are binding. The Committee is authorized to perform only prospective ethics reviews and cannot conduct retrospective evaluations. It is not authorized to rule on issues of scientific integrity, such as plagiarism or falsification, nor can it provide opinions on clinical or other applied psychological procedures, or review research plans not carried out at or involving a participating institution. Each institution delegates one or two members with a PhD (or equivalent) - one member if it has eight or fewer qualified psychology faculty or researchers, and two if it has more - for a three-year term. Members serve without remuneration (though expenses are reimbursed by their own institution), and the chair is elected from among the members, rotating annually.
Starting in 2017, university faculties in the humanities and social sciences began adopting practices pioneered by the field of psychology. Thus, the current system consists of the Joint REC (supported by a network of 14 psychology institutions) and 11 other RECs spread across five universities. Together, these bodies cover a wide range of disciplines - including psychology, pedagogy, law, economics, and theology - spanning the social, behavioral, and humanities fields.
One such social science REC aims to integrate research ethics and integrity into its work. Specifically, the Faculty of Social Sciences at Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE) established the Research Integrity, Research Ethics, and Data Processing Committee to oversee these areas and ensure compliant data processing across all faculty research. Its framework aligns university social science research with major international integrity standards (Singapore Statement, Hong Kong Principles, and the European Code of Conduct) and requires compliance with GDPR in handling personal data. The Committee consists of a chair (an experienced, habilitated lecturer appointed for a six-year term by the Faculty Council upon the dean's recommendation) and 5 members (including one representative from the Doctoral School of Sociology, the Head of the Némedi Dénes Library as a permanent invited member, and 3 other members whose delegation is strictly regulated: candidates are nominated by faculty institutes and the Students' Union, with the final decision made by the Faculty Council, which elects members for four-year terms - initially using a staggered rotation). The committee's work is also supported by a secretary. The Committee convenes monthly meetings (remote participation allowed). A minimum of three members must be present to reach a quorum. For prospective ethical approval, the head of research submits a digitally signed application and attachments at least 10 working days before a meeting; the Secretariat checks for formal completeness and assigns a registration number, after which the chair allocates the case for written review before a simple-majority decision is made. Approved projects receive a numbered ethical approval and are entered into the Committee registry (with the faculty library notified for data-management support), while rejected applications receive written guidance for revision and resubmission. This Committee also conducts ethical examinations of integrity or ethics problems in ongoing or completed studies - the process that is mandatory for reports involving faculty-led projects and optional on request. Using documentation requests, parallel evaluations, a hearing, and a unanimous statement, it reaches the conclusion and escalates confirmed integrity breaches to faculty leadership and the Faculty Ethics Committee for potential disciplinary action.
Typically, RECs reviewing non-health-related research base their standards on the ALLEA European Code of Conduct (2023) and the Hungarian Academy of Sciences’ Code of Scientific Ethics (2024), while RECs reviewing psychology research specifically also base their standards on the APA Ethics Code. The REC composition in different universities and other research institutions varies by field. In the joint REC reviewing psychology research, the committee is composed of psychology researchers who are recognized experts in their specific fields. In RECs for other non-health disciplines, the membership is typically more multidisciplinary, consisting of researchers with diverse academic backgrounds (generally holding a PhD), as well as administrative and managerial staff to support the process. More specifically, the REC chair and the contact person often function as the secretariat. Their responsibilities include organizing the review process, managing communications (emails), processing applications and issuing approvals. The average timespan from submitting a protocol to a REC reviewing non-health-related research until the review is finalized is usually within 1–2 months. These RECs usually have significant workload, and some data is available on their webpages regarding the number of reviews conducted each year.
Webpages of Non-health RECs
The Joint Committee on Ethics in Psychological Research (Egyesített Pszichológiai Kutatási Etikai Bizottság)
The Faculty of Social Sciences Research Integrity, Research Ethics and Data Processing Committee (ELTE Társadalomtudományi Kar Kutatásintegritási, Etikai és Adatkezelési Bizottság)
Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Education and Psychology at ELTE University (ELTE Pedagógiai és Pszichológiai Kar Kutatási Etikai Bizottsága)
Scientific and Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Special Needs Education at ELTE University (ELTE Bárczi Gusztáv Gyógypedagógiai Kar Tudományos és Kutatásetikai Bizottsága)
Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church Research Ethics Committee [with five faculty based subcommittees] (Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem Kutatási Etikai Bizottsága)
Research Ethics Committee of the Institute of Psychology at Pázmány Péter Catholic University (Pázmány Péter Katolikus Egyetem Pszichológiai Intézet Kutatásetikai Bizottsága)
Scientific and Research Ethics Committee of the András Pető Faculty at Semmelweis University (Pető András Kar Tudományos és Kutatásetikai Bizottsága)
Research Ethics Committee of Budapest Corvinus University (Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem Kutatásetikai Bizottsága)
Report contributor and national contact:
Péter Kakuk